Reflections on the Papal Christmas Message

| Christmas – 2012 | 12/26/12 | Questions from a Ewe |

The pope’s words seems to contradict the pope’s words depending on who he is addressing.  This is from the blog “Questions from a Ewe” and it is definitely food for thought and questioning. – Rosemary

Merry 2nd Day of Christmas!

At Christmastime the pope traditionally speaks several times and 2012 was no exception.  On Christmas Day, he gave his semi-annual “Urbi et Orbi” address, “to the city and to the world”.  His remarks centered on Psalm 85, “Kindness and truth shall meet; justice and peace shall kiss”, as he called upon several nations to embrace justice and peace.

During his Midnight Mass homily the pope drew an analogy between the innkeeper’s and our inhospitable attitudes towards Jesus.  He warned that, “We are so ‘full’ of ourselves that there is no room left for God.  And that means there is no room for others either, for children, for the poor, for the stranger.”  He called for a renewal of mind and an “opening up of our intellect, of the whole way we view the world and ourselves” emphasizing that, “The conversion that we need must truly reach into the depths of our relationship with reality.”

In this same homily he acknowledged the reality that at times people have corrupted religion, using it as “a pretext for intolerance and violence.”  He said this occurs, “when people think they have to take God’s cause into their own hands, making God into their private property.”  He advised, “We must be on the lookout for these distortions of the sacred.”

He also spoke of the shepherds’ “holy curiosity” resulting in “holy joy” that “impelled them to see this child in a manger…”  The Latin text for the scripture uses the word “trans-eamus” which means to “go across”.  Therefore the pope called people to imitate the shepherds, “daring to step beyond, to make the “transition” by which we step outside our habits of thought and habits of life.”

These are all good food for thought.

The pope also gave two other Christmas related addresses: his annual peace message and his annual speech to the Vatican bureaucracy.  In the first he said that gay marriage was a threat to world peace.  In the second he also lobbied strongly against homosexuality saying that, “People dispute the idea that they have a nature, given to them by their bodily identity, that serves as a defining element of the human being.”   He continued. “They deny their nature and decide that it is not something previously given to them, but that they make it for themselves.”  Furthermore he stated, “The manipulation of nature, which we deplore today where our environment is concerned, now becomes man’s fundamental choice where he himself is concerned,”

I have a daughter who is currently in medical school.  She has viewed the physical differences such as occurs in various brain sections between hetero- and homosexual people.  Due to the marked physical differences, medical students are emphatically taught homosexuality is not human-made nor a choice.

Similarly, the Catechism of the Catholic Church cedes that homosexuality’s “psychological genesis remains largely unexplained (CCC 2357).”  It also states homosexuals, “… do not choose their homosexual condition; for most of them it is a trial (CCC 2358).”

Thus, it seems science and church teachings agree that homosexual individuals do not opt to become as such.

The pope speaks of kindness and truth meeting.  His statements portraying homosexuality as selfish personal choices are both unkind and untrue whether measured against science or church teachings.  Therefore, he needs to retract them.

Furthermore, there is no evidence to support his claim that homosexuality threatens world peace.  Indeed, if God creates homosexuals which seems true according to Church teaching (they, “do not choose their homosexual condition”), why accuse it of threatening world peace?

Because the church acknowledges homosexuality is not self-determined, the Catechism teaches homosexuals, “… must be accepted with respect, compassion, and sensitivity. Every sign of unjust discrimination in their regard should be avoided.”

Yet, the pope and hierarchy wage a crusade to deny secular civil rights to homosexuals. In its most extreme variations such as in Uganda, Catholic bishops support death-penalty legislation for committing homosexual acts.  Perhaps instead of accusing homosexuals for threatening peace, should we consider societal injustices against them as potential culprits?  When the church follows the pope’s advice and lays aside being “so full of itself”, will justice and peace be able to kiss more easily?

Homosexuals are not the only casualties from the hierarchy’s sustained state of “being full of itself.”  Theologians, clergy, and laypeople in their “holy curiosity” and “holy joy” are impelled to seek the Christ child.  But whenever this journey leads them to question church teachings or practices such as pertaining to justice for homosexuals, embracing scientific truths about human sexuality, or relinquishing gender-based stereotypes, the church undertakes swift, severe and systematic efforts to marginalize and discredit them. Is this truth, kindness or justice?  Is it no wonder the church lacks peace?  It would seem that the more full the hierarchy are of themselves, the less full the pews are.

The Catechism of the Catholic Church also teaches, “Basing itself on Sacred Scripture, which presents homosexual acts as acts of grave depravity, tradition has always declared that homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered (2357).”   On one hand the church says to offer compassion and sensitivity but on the other hand it clearly dehumanizes and even worse, demonizes homosexuals by calling their God-given inclinations “intrinsically disordered.”

I do not suppose to know what it’s like to be homosexual since I was not born as such. But, I do have many friends and family members who are.  It is difficult to watch their angst as they realize and accept who they were made to be.  I trust the process is magnitudes more difficult to live.

I also do not suppose to know what it’s like to be God.  I just try to discern moment-by-moment what God asks of me, knowing that I will not always get it right.  And, I am thankful for a forgiving God who sent a redeeming savior incarnate via a small impoverished child to compensate for when I don’t get it right.

However, as the pope mentioned in his Midnight Mass homily, intolerance and violence occur, “when people think they have to take God’s cause into their own hands, making God into their private property.”  As the pope advised, “We must be on the lookout for these distortions of the sacred” to guard against physical and structural violence.

Should the pope and hierarchy follow the pope’s suggestion to seek an opening up of their intellect, of the whole way they view the world and themselves.  Does the hierarchy dare to, as the pope advises, “… step outside our habits of thought and habits of life.”  Can the church accept the reality of truths God reveals through science or will it continue to cling to its security blanket of “sacred traditions” even when woven of inaccuracies or untruths?

This entry was posted in In the News. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>